I wrote the following in response to a blog I read on Feminism and Motherhood asking how the choice to stay at home fit into Feminism . I just came across it and found it so interesting for me to read now that I've returned to work. This was from February 2006:
I'm a Stay At Home Mother to two children, ages two and four. I also write part time. It's a good rhythm for me but it may not work for other mothers. The good news is that I don't expect other mothers to do what I do. If they want to watch soaps all day or join a scrapbooking club, then that's their choice. But it's not mine. And that is OKAY.
It pisses me off that this is not a conversation that men are having. My husband is a designer who works with a bunch of other geeky designer dads and they don't sit around and judge one another on the amount of time Dad #1 spends reading to Junior or that Dad #2 is spending practicing multiplication tables with little Susie.
As someone who would consider herself a wicked feminist (is that a bad word now?), I choose to stay at home with my kids. I will likely return to work when they are both in school. I have a college degree and I don't consider myself a failure because this is what I choose to do. I'd like to go back to school one day to study Music. And guess what? I may NEVER use that training or that degree towards related employment. Why can't education be for its own sake anymore anyway? Why must degree=work?
I thought that having "rights" was all about having CHOICES. I have the freedom to do what I see best with my life and for my family. For some women, that's working and putting food on the table. For others, it's working outside the home because it makes them better mothers. For me, it's being at home. We're all big girls here. Can't we decide that for ourselves?
My mother worked on and off while I was a kid. Yes, there were times I wanted her there that she wasn't. There were also times she was there that I wish she would vanish. I could say the same thing for my husband AND my kids. My kids will say the same thing for me.
I have a 23 month old daughter and my biggest hope for her (and my 4 year old son) is that they do what they see fit to make them happy without neccesary regard for what society deems appropriate. Unhappy parents are bad parents. No one wants a martyr mother. If my daughter chooses to work, it will not have devalued what I have done here. On the contrary, I will hope that being here for her allowed her to make a decision that had nothing to do with what I think she should do.
That, after all, is what successful parenting is all about-launching them, helping them find their own voice, and stepping back when it's time.
I have seen the trend towards the child-centered parenting and franky, I think the issues this philosophy raises are enormous. I am not responsible for my children's happiness. That seems a shocking statement, I'm sure. But I stand by it. I love them and vow to protect them and guide them and nurture them but how else will they learn how to create their own future if I am constantly doing it for them? And if my life happiness is ruled by theirs, what does that teach them? In order for them to learn how to be happy, they must first see that it is possible and that it is a choice. That's what I hope to teach them.




