I admit, I want social programs. I want affordable healthcare for everyone. I want amazing education for our children. I don't understand people who don't care about these things or don't understand why they are vital to the health of this nation.
And I'm smart enough to understand that those programs cost money. I don't mind paying for part of it. And to those who say they don't want to pay for it because it's not "their" issue (like people who don't want to pay higher school taxes because their kids are out of school), I say GROW UP. All of these programs (and countless others) affect EVERYONE, whether directly or not.
My goal as a parent (and a person) is to teach my children that they are connected to this world. They were blessed enough to be born in a free country to educated, loving parents. With that, comes great privileges and also great responsibility. In the same way that they will one day be responsible for making their beds and cleaning their rooms, they are repsonsible for respecting the environment. In the same way they are responsible for taking care of each other, they are to tend to their neighbors, near and far. That responsibility is what a true Christian understands. It's not about money. It's about what's right. And it's about being blessed enough to be part of the world's only superpower. America has moral obligations just as its citizens do. Our government MUST be an example of that. Otherwise, what is the point?
We are all a part of many "families." The families in our house, our neighborhood, our city, our country, our gender, our race (you get the point) and those communities are connected in very small and very great ways. If the kid down the street isn't lucky enough to be born into a loving family who values education (after all, it IS just luck), it will affect everyone he comes into contact with and those people and their actions in turn affect me even if I never even knew the guy. Martin Luther King Jr. once said "Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere." In one way, I think this is what he meant.
That kid may turn to crime. He may hurt someone. He may go on welfare. He may go to jail. In all of those scenarios, he becomes my problem. And then there are the things he may NOT do- He may not contribute to my world. He may not teach my child. He may not give back. So every choice he makes affects my world. Even if I never knew that kid.
I understand that I affect my world just as you do, too. So, it is in my best interest to ensure that he is taken care of (which doesn't mean just hand him money-as the Republicans seem to ascribe to Democrats- but may mean to teach, to train, to love, to respect, to understand, to offer). In turn, I expect him to give it back to the others.
Some people just don't see that vital connection. Some look at anyone in need (which is everyone, by the way) as his own island. "It's not my problem." It seems to be all about MINE MINE MINE with them. They have the "right" to own guns. They have the "right" to drive huge gas-guzzling SUVs with their "I Love America" bumper stickers (If you LOVE your country so much, how about protecting her natural resources? How about decreasing our dependence on foreign oil?) They have the "right" to spend their money only on themselves. They have the "right" to decide who is worthy of the rights our Constitution declares are for EVERY PERSON.
I have the same rights. But what about our RESPONSIBILITIES? Some right-wing "Christians" seem to have missed the Christ part of that word. Do they really beleive that Christ (who never owned a thing) would be bickering about his share of that last supper? When the bill came, was he going to bitch and moan about having to pay for Peter and Paul? Seriously.
Many people only speak of these kinds of social programs in terms of dollars-"those Democrats are going to raise taxes again!" Yes, these programs cost money, but we are the WEALTHIEST nation in this universe. Is that money better spent benefitting Corporations and the Wealthy? Personally, I think George Bush can keep his lousy $200 he sent me and do something about the fact that my dad is worried he can't afford his $1000 a month rheumatoid arthritis prescription (one of 5 he takes each month) since the company he retired from (after 30 years) will offer him no medical benefits despite the steadily increasing (and nauseatingly high) salaries of the execuitves.
So, that's very generally why I'm supporting the Democratic nominee. In more specific terms, I don't hate George W. Bush. I believe that his administration has done what they deem best (although I disagree with what that has been) and have cut corners and fed their egos just as many Democrats have done. John Kerry is probably the most bring guy around. I wish there was someone more dynamic, better spoken, someone with some charisma. But I'll take what I can get. Namely, someone who comes a little closer to Christ.
I want a candidate that understands that we are part of a bigger world and who aims to be more than just the biggest kid on the block. I'd like to see some humility and some respect for the rest of the world and not just dominance. It all comes back around, after all. We learned that on 9/11.
It's embarrassing to me this weird, blind patriotism that occurred after the tragedy of 9/11. No one was allowed to question one move the Bush administration made for fear of seeming unpatriotic. "You're either with us, or yo're against us. If you don't support our President, the no-bid contract of Halliburton, the connection between 9/11 and Iraq, and your loss of personal freedom with the Patriot Act, then go move to France! Now shut up and eat your Freedom Fries! "
I feel like the current administration is still playing that card. It's ironic to me because that questioning is what makes us Americans. It's what makes us free.